imidazole ( Search Results


95
Chem Impex International imidazole
Imidazole, supplied by Chem Impex International, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/imidazole/product/Chem Impex International
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
imidazole - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Bio-Rad synthesis
Synthesis, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/synthesis/product/Bio-Rad
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
synthesis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Selleck Chemicals cystine deprivation cd
Cystine Deprivation Cd, supplied by Selleck Chemicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cystine deprivation cd/product/Selleck Chemicals
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cystine deprivation cd - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Biosynth Carbosynth cetp
Figure 2. An interinstrument platform comparison <t>of</t> <t>PLTP</t> and <t>CETP</t> tracer enrichment data. (A) PRM scans of the same CETP peptide from the Q Exactive and the Lumos. The relative peak intensities of the fragment ions are conserved between the 2 instruments. The y7 2HM3 (tracer) peak environment is zoomed in. R = 120 K for the Q Exactive and 240 K for the Lumos. (B) Loess regression plots showing that the standard error (gray) of the fitted curves is lower on the Lumos. PLTP data are from alpha1 and CETP from alpha2. Legend: the PRM ions’ m/z values. (C) Box plots depicting the distribution of the enrichment data in B. Each data point is the average enrichment (n = 3 PRM ions’ measurements) per time point. The box plots depict the minimum and maximum values (whiskers), the upper and lower quartiles, and the median. The length of the box represents the interquartile range. The gray lines indicate the relative shift in enrichment value per given time point. Variance was calculated using individual PRM ion enrichment data in B, not the averages.
Cetp, supplied by Biosynth Carbosynth, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cetp/product/Biosynth Carbosynth
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cetp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Valiant Co Ltd mgso4
Figure 2. An interinstrument platform comparison <t>of</t> <t>PLTP</t> and <t>CETP</t> tracer enrichment data. (A) PRM scans of the same CETP peptide from the Q Exactive and the Lumos. The relative peak intensities of the fragment ions are conserved between the 2 instruments. The y7 2HM3 (tracer) peak environment is zoomed in. R = 120 K for the Q Exactive and 240 K for the Lumos. (B) Loess regression plots showing that the standard error (gray) of the fitted curves is lower on the Lumos. PLTP data are from alpha1 and CETP from alpha2. Legend: the PRM ions’ m/z values. (C) Box plots depicting the distribution of the enrichment data in B. Each data point is the average enrichment (n = 3 PRM ions’ measurements) per time point. The box plots depict the minimum and maximum values (whiskers), the upper and lower quartiles, and the median. The length of the box represents the interquartile range. The gray lines indicate the relative shift in enrichment value per given time point. Variance was calculated using individual PRM ion enrichment data in B, not the averages.
Mgso4, supplied by Valiant Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mgso4/product/Valiant Co Ltd
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mgso4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Valiant Co Ltd dihydroxytryptamine 7 hydroxyserotonin creatinine sulfate
Figure 2. An interinstrument platform comparison <t>of</t> <t>PLTP</t> and <t>CETP</t> tracer enrichment data. (A) PRM scans of the same CETP peptide from the Q Exactive and the Lumos. The relative peak intensities of the fragment ions are conserved between the 2 instruments. The y7 2HM3 (tracer) peak environment is zoomed in. R = 120 K for the Q Exactive and 240 K for the Lumos. (B) Loess regression plots showing that the standard error (gray) of the fitted curves is lower on the Lumos. PLTP data are from alpha1 and CETP from alpha2. Legend: the PRM ions’ m/z values. (C) Box plots depicting the distribution of the enrichment data in B. Each data point is the average enrichment (n = 3 PRM ions’ measurements) per time point. The box plots depict the minimum and maximum values (whiskers), the upper and lower quartiles, and the median. The length of the box represents the interquartile range. The gray lines indicate the relative shift in enrichment value per given time point. Variance was calculated using individual PRM ion enrichment data in B, not the averages.
Dihydroxytryptamine 7 Hydroxyserotonin Creatinine Sulfate, supplied by Valiant Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dihydroxytryptamine 7 hydroxyserotonin creatinine sulfate/product/Valiant Co Ltd
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dihydroxytryptamine 7 hydroxyserotonin creatinine sulfate - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Chem Impex International fmoc
Figure 2. An interinstrument platform comparison <t>of</t> <t>PLTP</t> and <t>CETP</t> tracer enrichment data. (A) PRM scans of the same CETP peptide from the Q Exactive and the Lumos. The relative peak intensities of the fragment ions are conserved between the 2 instruments. The y7 2HM3 (tracer) peak environment is zoomed in. R = 120 K for the Q Exactive and 240 K for the Lumos. (B) Loess regression plots showing that the standard error (gray) of the fitted curves is lower on the Lumos. PLTP data are from alpha1 and CETP from alpha2. Legend: the PRM ions’ m/z values. (C) Box plots depicting the distribution of the enrichment data in B. Each data point is the average enrichment (n = 3 PRM ions’ measurements) per time point. The box plots depict the minimum and maximum values (whiskers), the upper and lower quartiles, and the median. The length of the box represents the interquartile range. The gray lines indicate the relative shift in enrichment value per given time point. Variance was calculated using individual PRM ion enrichment data in B, not the averages.
Fmoc, supplied by Chem Impex International, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fmoc/product/Chem Impex International
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fmoc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Santa Cruz Biotechnology imidazole
Figure 2. An interinstrument platform comparison <t>of</t> <t>PLTP</t> and <t>CETP</t> tracer enrichment data. (A) PRM scans of the same CETP peptide from the Q Exactive and the Lumos. The relative peak intensities of the fragment ions are conserved between the 2 instruments. The y7 2HM3 (tracer) peak environment is zoomed in. R = 120 K for the Q Exactive and 240 K for the Lumos. (B) Loess regression plots showing that the standard error (gray) of the fitted curves is lower on the Lumos. PLTP data are from alpha1 and CETP from alpha2. Legend: the PRM ions’ m/z values. (C) Box plots depicting the distribution of the enrichment data in B. Each data point is the average enrichment (n = 3 PRM ions’ measurements) per time point. The box plots depict the minimum and maximum values (whiskers), the upper and lower quartiles, and the median. The length of the box represents the interquartile range. The gray lines indicate the relative shift in enrichment value per given time point. Variance was calculated using individual PRM ion enrichment data in B, not the averages.
Imidazole, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/imidazole/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
imidazole - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Chem Impex International biotin n hydroxysuccinimide
Figure 2. An interinstrument platform comparison <t>of</t> <t>PLTP</t> and <t>CETP</t> tracer enrichment data. (A) PRM scans of the same CETP peptide from the Q Exactive and the Lumos. The relative peak intensities of the fragment ions are conserved between the 2 instruments. The y7 2HM3 (tracer) peak environment is zoomed in. R = 120 K for the Q Exactive and 240 K for the Lumos. (B) Loess regression plots showing that the standard error (gray) of the fitted curves is lower on the Lumos. PLTP data are from alpha1 and CETP from alpha2. Legend: the PRM ions’ m/z values. (C) Box plots depicting the distribution of the enrichment data in B. Each data point is the average enrichment (n = 3 PRM ions’ measurements) per time point. The box plots depict the minimum and maximum values (whiskers), the upper and lower quartiles, and the median. The length of the box represents the interquartile range. The gray lines indicate the relative shift in enrichment value per given time point. Variance was calculated using individual PRM ion enrichment data in B, not the averages.
Biotin N Hydroxysuccinimide, supplied by Chem Impex International, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/biotin n hydroxysuccinimide/product/Chem Impex International
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
biotin n hydroxysuccinimide - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Chem Impex International 1 bis
Figure 2. An interinstrument platform comparison <t>of</t> <t>PLTP</t> and <t>CETP</t> tracer enrichment data. (A) PRM scans of the same CETP peptide from the Q Exactive and the Lumos. The relative peak intensities of the fragment ions are conserved between the 2 instruments. The y7 2HM3 (tracer) peak environment is zoomed in. R = 120 K for the Q Exactive and 240 K for the Lumos. (B) Loess regression plots showing that the standard error (gray) of the fitted curves is lower on the Lumos. PLTP data are from alpha1 and CETP from alpha2. Legend: the PRM ions’ m/z values. (C) Box plots depicting the distribution of the enrichment data in B. Each data point is the average enrichment (n = 3 PRM ions’ measurements) per time point. The box plots depict the minimum and maximum values (whiskers), the upper and lower quartiles, and the median. The length of the box represents the interquartile range. The gray lines indicate the relative shift in enrichment value per given time point. Variance was calculated using individual PRM ion enrichment data in B, not the averages.
1 Bis, supplied by Chem Impex International, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/1 bis/product/Chem Impex International
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
1 bis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Chem Impex International experimental section materials n trimethylsilylimidazole chem impex
Figure 2. An interinstrument platform comparison <t>of</t> <t>PLTP</t> and <t>CETP</t> tracer enrichment data. (A) PRM scans of the same CETP peptide from the Q Exactive and the Lumos. The relative peak intensities of the fragment ions are conserved between the 2 instruments. The y7 2HM3 (tracer) peak environment is zoomed in. R = 120 K for the Q Exactive and 240 K for the Lumos. (B) Loess regression plots showing that the standard error (gray) of the fitted curves is lower on the Lumos. PLTP data are from alpha1 and CETP from alpha2. Legend: the PRM ions’ m/z values. (C) Box plots depicting the distribution of the enrichment data in B. Each data point is the average enrichment (n = 3 PRM ions’ measurements) per time point. The box plots depict the minimum and maximum values (whiskers), the upper and lower quartiles, and the median. The length of the box represents the interquartile range. The gray lines indicate the relative shift in enrichment value per given time point. Variance was calculated using individual PRM ion enrichment data in B, not the averages.
Experimental Section Materials N Trimethylsilylimidazole Chem Impex, supplied by Chem Impex International, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/experimental section materials n trimethylsilylimidazole chem impex/product/Chem Impex International
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
experimental section materials n trimethylsilylimidazole chem impex - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Chem Impex International na fmoc n im trityl l histidine
Figure 2. An interinstrument platform comparison <t>of</t> <t>PLTP</t> and <t>CETP</t> tracer enrichment data. (A) PRM scans of the same CETP peptide from the Q Exactive and the Lumos. The relative peak intensities of the fragment ions are conserved between the 2 instruments. The y7 2HM3 (tracer) peak environment is zoomed in. R = 120 K for the Q Exactive and 240 K for the Lumos. (B) Loess regression plots showing that the standard error (gray) of the fitted curves is lower on the Lumos. PLTP data are from alpha1 and CETP from alpha2. Legend: the PRM ions’ m/z values. (C) Box plots depicting the distribution of the enrichment data in B. Each data point is the average enrichment (n = 3 PRM ions’ measurements) per time point. The box plots depict the minimum and maximum values (whiskers), the upper and lower quartiles, and the median. The length of the box represents the interquartile range. The gray lines indicate the relative shift in enrichment value per given time point. Variance was calculated using individual PRM ion enrichment data in B, not the averages.
Na Fmoc N Im Trityl L Histidine, supplied by Chem Impex International, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/na fmoc n im trityl l histidine/product/Chem Impex International
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
na fmoc n im trityl l histidine - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Figure 2. An interinstrument platform comparison of PLTP and CETP tracer enrichment data. (A) PRM scans of the same CETP peptide from the Q Exactive and the Lumos. The relative peak intensities of the fragment ions are conserved between the 2 instruments. The y7 2HM3 (tracer) peak environment is zoomed in. R = 120 K for the Q Exactive and 240 K for the Lumos. (B) Loess regression plots showing that the standard error (gray) of the fitted curves is lower on the Lumos. PLTP data are from alpha1 and CETP from alpha2. Legend: the PRM ions’ m/z values. (C) Box plots depicting the distribution of the enrichment data in B. Each data point is the average enrichment (n = 3 PRM ions’ measurements) per time point. The box plots depict the minimum and maximum values (whiskers), the upper and lower quartiles, and the median. The length of the box represents the interquartile range. The gray lines indicate the relative shift in enrichment value per given time point. Variance was calculated using individual PRM ion enrichment data in B, not the averages.

Journal: JCI insight

Article Title: Metabolism of PLTP, CETP, and LCAT on multiple HDL sizes using the Orbitrap Fusion Lumos.

doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.143526

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 2. An interinstrument platform comparison of PLTP and CETP tracer enrichment data. (A) PRM scans of the same CETP peptide from the Q Exactive and the Lumos. The relative peak intensities of the fragment ions are conserved between the 2 instruments. The y7 2HM3 (tracer) peak environment is zoomed in. R = 120 K for the Q Exactive and 240 K for the Lumos. (B) Loess regression plots showing that the standard error (gray) of the fitted curves is lower on the Lumos. PLTP data are from alpha1 and CETP from alpha2. Legend: the PRM ions’ m/z values. (C) Box plots depicting the distribution of the enrichment data in B. Each data point is the average enrichment (n = 3 PRM ions’ measurements) per time point. The box plots depict the minimum and maximum values (whiskers), the upper and lower quartiles, and the median. The length of the box represents the interquartile range. The gray lines indicate the relative shift in enrichment value per given time point. Variance was calculated using individual PRM ion enrichment data in B, not the averages.

Article Snippet: Each protein was quantified using the following peptide standards: APOA1 (THLAPYSDEL[R-labeled]), APOE (LGPLVEQG[R-labeled]), LCAT (SSGLVSNAPGVQI[R-labeled]), CETP (ASYPDITGE[K-labeled]), and PLTP (AVEPQLQEEE[R-labeled]) (New England Peptides, NEP, Supplemental Table 2).

Techniques: Comparison

Figure 3. Compartmental models and kinetics parameters for PLTP and CETP in the larger alpha HDL size fractions. (A) Compartmental model for PLTP and CETP (the average of n = 6 participants). PLTP flux into alpha1 is approximately 45% from the source (0.010 mg/kg/d) and 55% from the smaller alpha2 (0.012 mg/kg/d). Approximately 75% of PLTP on alpha2 is transferred to alpha0 and alpha1 (0.10 and 0.59 pool/d, respectively) while the remaining 25% is removed from the model system (0.20 pool/d). CETP appears on alpha1 and alpha2 via direct secretion. (B) Enrichment curve fits generated from the models in A, participant 1. (C) FCR and production rate (PR) for PLTP and CETP. Bar graphs represent the mean value for n = 6 participants, error bars represent SD, and open circles represent values per participant.

Journal: JCI insight

Article Title: Metabolism of PLTP, CETP, and LCAT on multiple HDL sizes using the Orbitrap Fusion Lumos.

doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.143526

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 3. Compartmental models and kinetics parameters for PLTP and CETP in the larger alpha HDL size fractions. (A) Compartmental model for PLTP and CETP (the average of n = 6 participants). PLTP flux into alpha1 is approximately 45% from the source (0.010 mg/kg/d) and 55% from the smaller alpha2 (0.012 mg/kg/d). Approximately 75% of PLTP on alpha2 is transferred to alpha0 and alpha1 (0.10 and 0.59 pool/d, respectively) while the remaining 25% is removed from the model system (0.20 pool/d). CETP appears on alpha1 and alpha2 via direct secretion. (B) Enrichment curve fits generated from the models in A, participant 1. (C) FCR and production rate (PR) for PLTP and CETP. Bar graphs represent the mean value for n = 6 participants, error bars represent SD, and open circles represent values per participant.

Article Snippet: Each protein was quantified using the following peptide standards: APOA1 (THLAPYSDEL[R-labeled]), APOE (LGPLVEQG[R-labeled]), LCAT (SSGLVSNAPGVQI[R-labeled]), CETP (ASYPDITGE[K-labeled]), and PLTP (AVEPQLQEEE[R-labeled]) (New England Peptides, NEP, Supplemental Table 2).

Techniques: Generated